• News
  • Features
  • Analysis
  • Interviews
  • Opinions
    • Work & Employment
  • Columnists
  • Young Lawyers
Thursday, February 25, 2021
  • News
  • Features
  • Analysis
  • Interviews
  • Opinions
    • Work & Employment
  • Columnists
  • Young Lawyers
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Features
  • Analysis
  • Interviews
  • Opinions
    • Work & Employment
  • Columnists
  • Young Lawyers
No Result
View All Result
The Legal Reports
No Result
View All Result

Restructuring: What Human Resource Personnel Must Know

Emmanuel Ankunda by Emmanuel Ankunda
May 15, 2020
in Analysis, Opinions, Work & Employment
0
Restructuring: What Human Resource Personnel Must Know

One of the very first companies to have considered a restructure as a direct result of COVID 19 is Nice House of Plastics. In a press release of May 13, 2020, the company decried the “extremely high cost base” in keeping up operations/ Courtesy photo

33
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

 


As COVID-19 continues to interrupt, HR professionals have to keep track of a great deal of developments. One of them is keeping up to speed with modalities on how a possible restructuring can be made in case the company chooses to go down that path.

Advertisement

Restructuring generally means all that process of changing the operational set up of a company with a view to improving the way the business runs or managing an economic situation.

In times like these when economies are volatile, companies are allowed to make a number of sweeping changes in an effort to realign themselves with economic realities. Therefore, the overarching purpose of restructuring is to get the right roles configured the right way.

In the process, new positions may be created in the company, existing positions may be merged and some employees may be deemed surplus to requirements. This makes those employees redundant and subject to a potential lay off.

To be fair, restructuring is an uncomfortable process for employees to go through. Nevertheless, the law seems to have observed that it is a lesser evil for employees to suffer possible layoffs than the company maintaining the wage liability and ultimately being the subject of insolvency proceedings.

One of the very first companies to have considered a restructure as a direct result of COVID 19 is Nice House of Plastics. In a press release of May 13, 2020, the company decried the “extremely high cost base” in keeping up operations. It was stated: “the company continued to face a major challenge of balancing the cost of doing business against its ability to meet customer requirements.” One of the expenses observed to have soared disproportionately were employee costs.

In order to cushion the company against an economic blow, it was resolved that: “the company will immediately embark on a restructuring program that will result in retirement of all those who were scheduled to retire, a total of 09 members of staff, staff redundancies affecting 47 members of staff, and leave without pay for the remaining staff for an initial three months.”

In times like these, restructuring is one of the plausible options available to a company facing distress. Companies must however follow all the necessary protocols for the restructuring to result in a success. The importance of a meticulously organized restructuring is that it insulates the company against possible claims for unlawful termination for employees who would be deemed surplus to requirements.

The first and probably most fundamental legal prerequisite for any restructuring and ultimate redundancy of workers is that there must be a genuine reason for it. Companies are not at liberty to lay off employees on the basis of restructuring for just about any reason. Restructuring is a managerial prerogative but the requirement ofcourse is for this to be done fairly and in accordance with the law.

The Employment Act 2006 in Section 81(1) stipulates that restructuring can only be made for reasons that are economic, technological, structural or other reasons of similar nature. It is predicted that most of the processes of restructuring made during the COVID-19 pandemic will be made for economic reasons under section 81(1) of the Employment Act 2006.

It is imperative to note however that it is not just the overall recognition of an economic slump due to the pandemic that will suffice. Companies will have to first see to it that their revenues have plummeted for them to rely on economic grounds for a restructuring process.

The reason for this is that there is no one size fits all in this COVID-19 situation. While some companies such as those dealing in tourism and travel services have had their operations halted, others such as those dealing in online deliveries have seen a peak in their operations. It would therefore be believable to restructure for economic reasons in the first situation, but certainly not the second.

The other requirement is good faith. Restructures and redundancies are generally underpinned by the principle of good faith. There is need for consultation with the employees or their trade unions before a decision is made. This requirement is rubber stamped by the old English case of Williams v Campair Maxam Ltd.

The defendant company had been losing business and departmental managers had to pick teams of core staff who could be retained to keep the business viable. Employees to be retained had been chosen on the basis of personal preference and the union was not consulted.

In canvassing the issue on whether this restructuring had led to unfair termination, the court laid down a number of principles to guide any termination on grounds of redundancy, viz:

  • The employee should give ample notice of the impending redundancy;
  • The employer should consult with the union as to the best means by which the desired management result can be achieved jointly and with little hardship to the employee as possible. The employer should agree with the union as to the selection criteria to be applied;
  • The selection criteria should be objective and set against such things such as attendance record, efficiency at the job, experience and length of service;
  • Selection should be made fairly in accordance with that criteria; and
  • Before taking the decision to terminate the contract, the employee should consider the possibility of offering the employee alternative employment.

These principles enunciated in case law are mandatory. It can be seen that good faith is a centerpiece of any restructuring process. Employers must consult their employees and this involves considering feedback with an open mind. The restructuring cannot also be used as a cloak to terminate “troublesome” employees. The selection of who goes and who gets retained must be fair, and must take into account the employee’s overall contribution to the company.

It would also be good practice for the employer to consult the employee on considering alternatives such as change in employee benefits, occupying alternative roles within other parts of the company or a reduction in working hours or a shift to part time working.

For its own part, section 81(1) (a) of the Employment Act 2006 mandates an employer who would like to terminate more than ten employees within a space of less than three months to provide representatives of the labour union of the employees with relevant information at least four weeks before the first of terminations. The information must show the number workers likely to be involved and the period over which the terminations would be carried out.

The employer must also under section 81(1) (b) notify the labour commissioner of the reasons of the termination, the category and number of workers likely to be affected, and the period over which the terminations are to be carried out.

An employer will be in a good position to defend any subsequent labour claims if he or she can set out a clear rationale for the redundancy terminations, which are supported by evidence and if a fair and thorough process is undertaken.

Needless to mention of course is that all terminated employees due to redundancy will be entitled to all their terminal benefits both under Employment contract and the Employment Contract 2006.


 

Be part of the largest community of leading Ugandan legal bloggers, Submit your well researched, factual, analytical and accurate articles to the Editor via editor@thelegalreports.com or 0709751228


To advertise on this website contact 0709751228

Tags: Restructuring
Share33TweetSend
AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Emmanuel Ankunda

Emmanuel Ankunda

Emmanuel Ankunda is an associate at Kyagaba & Otatiina Advocates (Dentons – Uganda). He is a holder of a Bachelors Degree in Law (LLB) from Makerere University and a Post Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice (P. Dip. LP) from the Law Development Centre. Prior to joining the firm, he clerked at ENS Africa Advocates (Kampala Office), and Kampala Associated Advocates. He was also part of the Editorial Committee for the Makerere Law Journal 2018. His practice focuses on civil litigation and Employment Law. Emmanuel likes to advise clients at the very start of the legal challenges when everything appears bleak

Related Posts

Legal advisory in Tax matters should be left to Tax Lawyers and not CPAs
Careers

Accountants and Tax Lawyers in Uganda’s Tax Advisory Space; Difference in Roles Demystified

by Mark Ruhindi
January 19, 2021
Shift of Power to the Tech Giants: Lessons for the Regulators
Analysis

Shift of Power to the Tech Giants: Lessons for the Regulators

by Solomon Murungi Adyeeri
January 18, 2021
Covid – 19 Vaccine and Intellectual Property: Were lessons learnt from past public health crises?
Analysis

Covid – 19 Vaccine and Intellectual Property: Were lessons learnt from past public health crises?

by Andrew Wandera
January 3, 2021
Tech companies have not paid their fair share in digital taxes
Analysis

France has set a digital tax precedent; should Uganda and Africa follow?

by Louis Namwanja Kizito
November 30, 2020
Registered Trademark sign
Analysis

5 Reasons to Trademark your Business Name and Logo

by Bright Natumanya - Tibugwisa and Co Advocates
November 12, 2020
Photo montage of businessman Hamis Kiggundu and a Diamond Trust Bank branch. The two have been embroiled in a legal showdown. Joseph Okuja looks at the case's tax implications
Analysis

Syndicated loans and tax implications – The case of Ham Vs DTB

by Joseph Okuja
October 12, 2020
Next Post
Webinar Etiquette: Tips On Holding Successful Online Meetings

Webinar Etiquette: Tips On Holding Successful Online Meetings

Discussion about this post

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

TRENDING

  • A Cooperative society office in Uganda

    How to start and operate a Savings and Credit Co-operative Society in Uganda

    60 shares
    Share 60 Tweet 0
  • Top Lawyers in Uganda revealed

    1583 shares
    Share 1583 Tweet 0
  • Joining Law School? Here is what you should know

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Supreme Court rejects more Bobi’s evidence as Chief Justice lashes out at the musician-turned politician

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Parliament should investigate the misconduct and incompetence of officials at Capital Markets Authority – Bank of Uganda COSASE style?

    64 shares
    Share 64 Tweet 0
ADVERTISEMENT

LATEST NEWS

Chief Justice, head of the Supreme Court Owiny Dollo

Supreme Court rejects more Bobi’s evidence as Chief Justice lashes out at the musician-turned politician

February 20, 2021
Joining Law School? Here is what you should know

Joining Law School? Here is what you should know

February 15, 2021
OPM SCANDAL: Kazinda to stay in Jail

OPM SCANDAL: Kazinda to stay in Jail

February 14, 2021
Supreme Court bench

Gov’t pays 12Bn in Retired Judicial Officers’ Benefits

February 10, 2021
Nuisance

Is Your Neighbour A Nuisance?

February 12, 2021

Advertisement

Advertisement

The Legal Reports

CATEGORIES

  • Analysis
  • BUSINESS
  • Careers
  • Columnists
  • CORONAVIRUS
  • Events
  • Features
  • Insights
  • Interviews
  • Law
  • Law Firms
  • Law School
  • Lawyers and Tech
  • Letters
  • News
  • Notice Board
  • Opinions
  • Regulation
  • Review
  • Special Reports
  • Tax
  • Uganda Judiciary Watch
  • Work & Employment
  • Young Lawyers

Follow Us

Follow us

Twitter

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2020 The Legal Reports - A Brand of Lex Internet Initiatives Ltd

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Features
  • Analysis
  • Interviews
  • Opinions
    • Work & Employment
  • Columnists
  • Young Lawyers

© 2020 The Legal Reports - A Brand of Lex Internet Initiatives Ltd

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In